%PDF-1.5
%
18 0 obj
<>]/Pages 15 0 R/Type/Catalog>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>stream
2011-10-13T01:43:22Z
Microsoft Word
2012-02-02T14:58:09-05:00
2012-02-02T14:58:09-05:00
Adobe Mac PDF Plug-in
application/pdf
Stacey McClurkin
Microsoft Word - State of IN Analysis of Impediments to FH Choice.doc
uuid:5384ccf4-b395-dd4b-a447-50e45ae95bc2
uuid:4893fc6c-ea9c-384f-8348-87f9864a6f69
1
B
http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/
pdf
Adobe PDF Schema
internal
A name object indicating whether the document has been modified to include trapping information
Trapped
Text
http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/
xmpMM
XMP Media Management Schema
internal
UUID based identifier for specific incarnation of a document
InstanceID
URI
http://www.aiim.org/pdfa/ns/id/
pdfaid
PDF/A ID Schema
internal
Part of PDF/A standard
part
Integer
internal
Amendment of PDF/A standard
amd
Text
internal
Conformance level of PDF/A standard
conformance
Text
endstream
endobj
59 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
70 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/CS0 cs 0 0 0 scn
/GS0 gs
/C2_0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 90 708.72 Tm
<0001>Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -1.16 TD
[(United States of America v. Edw)-1(ard Rose & Sons, Inc, et al. )]TJ
/TT1 1 Tf
(In February 2003, the )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
(Court issued an order granting the United States a preliminary injunctio\
n to enjoin the )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
[(defendants from occupying or further constructing 19 apartment buildings\
at W)2(estlake )]TJ
0.001 -1.14 Td
(Apartments in Belleville, Michigan and Lake Point Apartments in Batavia,\
Ohio, until )Tj
T*
(they could be redesigned or retrofitted to be brought into compliance wi\
th the Fair )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
(Housing Act. )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
( )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
[(The two complaints filed alleged Edward Rose & Sons, several affi)2(liate companies, as )]TJ
0 -1.16 TD
(well as individual architects and architectural firms, have engaged in a\
pattern or practice )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
(of discrimination against persons with disabilities. They have failed to\
included )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
[(accessible features required by the Fair Housing Act and the )2(Americans with Disabilities)1( )]TJ
0.001 -1.14 Td
(Act in a number of apartment complexes it developed in Indiana, Michigan\
, Ohio, )Tj
T*
[(Wisconsin, Illinois and Virginia.)1( )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
(The United States alleges that approximately 4,050 ground floor units in\
42 apartment )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
(complexes do not have accessible entrances, kitchens and bathrooms, alon\
g with other )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
[(building features. Edward)1( Rose & Sons is one of the largest multifamily developers in the )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
[(nation. Fifteen of the 42 apartment complexes sited in this case are loc\
ated in Indiana.)5( )]TJ
0 -1.16 TD
( )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
[(On August 25, 2004, the Sixth Circuit Court)1( of Appeals affirmed the decision of the )]TJ
0 -1.16 TD
[(district court granting the Untied States)2(\222 motion for a preliminary injunction. The)2( Circuit )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
(affirmed that the Fair Housing Act requries the common landing area betw\
een two )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
[(covered dwellings to be accessible to persons with disabilities. The def\
endants)3(\222 split-level )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
(design only provides access by way of a half-flight of stairs. )Tj
0 -1.16 TD
( )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>stream
HUgpV=wыOPAB&0 ]"QT !2[QmB1aecctbSPv H$?yo{ݻg! b4f䏛+{.O*/KYK:+ki4h.̞1AŜVA1ݴsf=?ힴOѾ^@I܌YUho횚;Qh7.p<}vIn~QX3Au<A繳jˆYWkz4lM>K͚xOA!a#"ZGǴm}_~:
}Ϸ.As\{mOoԞg@0bP%mpU@ z>D}̖cF@3p07paHeiyt2wMEG//$b'hSTDp啦3ZpC.uXƘ/S2
8\ ؊=8+llB=QW*s9[("ݨTu\+%.JiLn6UL;#0˱8AH;$e)o_ T9